Du bist nicht angemeldet.
Well, I think we all got the reference as it is a story about a man
in WW2 who saved manly jews who would have been killed by the nazi.
He is well known as he displays the good entrepreneur, a hero, in
comparision to the other important men of the german industrial
high-society which did not flinch to cooperate with the regime.
Sir Schneider seems to be some sort of aristocrat. So in addition you
twist the entrepreneur into an nobleman, who seems to get into problems
as his killing list tends to grow as he experience emotions the first
time in his life. So somebody who is first a pychopat who somewhat
turns into a man and away from the cold-blooded killer.
I highly doubt it that we germans would have dared to make this twist
on any sort by ourselfes to that person. For us this is a difficult
topic to make fun about.
As you are an american citizen this might be an other case.
To what type did you wand to classify this film?
Beitrag geändert von Teppic (21.11.2015 10:20)
Offline
Dunno if I just understand the English text differently, but for me it sounds as if the greatest accomplishment of "Sir Schneider" is to produce a list of people, he likes to see dead. Which of course is something different to the creation of a list, others "want you" to decide who dies or not.
So like Teppic said: I am not a one who likes to see a "fun" version of "Schindlers Liste". The only thing you need to rename in that movie, is the name of the movie. The content could be the same as the original one - just leaving out the name.
@Random cast
For original movies this is not allowed, as we use "random" or "fictional" characters in scandal news. And no, I do _not_ want to read then "hot pictures of `Schneider's List`-star XYZ leaked". It just sounds wrong.
Else - for fictional casts, you might use the new feature:
<!-- random:
generator = "countrycodes, gender, levelup"
countrycodes = "countrycode1 countrycode2 ..."
gender = 0 [random] 1 [male] 2 [female]
levelup = 0 [no levelup] 1 [levelup]
-->
<!-- a) as onetime usage: -->
<member index="1" function="64" generator="es,0"></member>
<!-- b) with a given GUID, for a later referencing possibility: -->
<member index="1" function="64" generator="es,0">mein-spanischer-zufalls-cast</member>
<!-- c) as person in <insignificantpeople> or <celebritypeople>
(with levelup and overriden family name -->
<person id="ein-deutscher-schauspieler" generator="de,1,1" last_name="Mueller" nick_name="Ein Mueller" />
available country codes:
aut - Austria
de - Germany
uk - England
cn - China
ru - Russia
tr - Turkey
us - USA
dk - Denmark
gr - Greek
es - Spain
bye
Ron
Offline
Guys, I didn't even mean that from the movie! I had no idea that it was about that stuff, and therefore it's deleted. Anyways, I didn't even know movies could have a Greek production country, or Russia, especially. That's a cool new system for fictional actors btw!
For now at least, I don't have any questions(I know, a shocker, but don't worry, I'm sure my inadept mind will get confused about something real soon). Best of luck on the development of the next update(hopefully the studio? Please? )!
Offline
Well, as Ronny expressed, he read something different from the text you
proposed. And yes, he is right, the text does not tell us anything of
a murderer but only of a person who wand to write down a list.
It was my interpretation of Sir Schneider beeing a cold-blooded killer...
When you look at it the way Ronny interpreted it it is not so problematic
as it is never said that Sir Schneider really "achieved" to write down
one single name and that could really be a good story for a drama or
comedy, too.
In the end it is only a thing of the right texting to prevent such misinterpretations. Don´t worry we could have (or already have?!) created
similar unintended missteps and therefore it is good to have more
eyes, ears and different perspectives to spot them.
Offline
Well, it's gone anyways; I don't want to have something controversial in a group of programmes that I might post in this forum later on, if I feel I have enough things and that they're good enough that is. I haven't actually been able to work on anything that has to do with my "addon" I guess you could say. This weekend's been pretty busy with life stuffs; nothing bad, just busy busy busy. Nonetheless, I plan to make programmes based on IMDb's Top 250 films of all time. If I run out of films that sound decent from there, or if I get bored with them, I'll move on to the week's top box-office films. After that, I'll look at new releases and then lastly all films and series of all time(if or when I decide to do series) that they have documented on their website. I think I'll actually start reading the description of some of these films and series I plan to mix up after that incident.
Offline